Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1006186731 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000
Monday, November 19, 2001 at 8:18 am
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Mel (1 messages posted)


Hi...I am assuming that everybody who has posted has been referring to XP Professional, as oppossed to the Home Edition...but anyways, here's what I've noticed different about the two: 1. XP still uses basically the same NT Kernel and NTFS file system as 2000, so the whole engine isn't much different. I'm sure that all of XP's pretty looks, bells, and whistles have to slow it down a little. 2. XP's Remote Assistance/Administration features are pretty cool. It works pretty much the same way that a Terminal Server connection does in Win2k server. This is something that Win2k Professional doesn't have, so I would upgrade just for this feature....but I don't feel the upgrade is worth it if your using Win2k Server. 3. XP's multimedia features smoke Win2k's. If your somebody that does a lot of work with graphics and sounds, I definitely suggest upgrading to XP; however, if your somebody like me that just needs an OS that is reliable and you need to get your work done quickly, stick with Win2k.


On Wednesday, October 3, 2001 at 11:24 pm, David wrote:
>I never used Win 2000, but I have XP now and love it. It has not crashed on me even
>once.
>
>If you don't like the 'new look' why don't you just put it into classic mode?
>
>


>On Wednesday, October 3, 2001 at 10:25 pm, Chris R. wrote:
>I've tried Windows Xp for about 20 days and found nothing that would make me want
>to deinstall windows 2000. in the matter of fact i started to hate it cause of its
>new look, but thats not the point..
>I would like to gather informations about whats really so good about Windows XP..
>what can it do that windows 2000 cant ? which advantiges did microsoft develop and
>what did they do wrong, so that i can make myself a picture of WinXP
>
>thnx and greetz
>Chris


Written in response to:
re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (David: Wednesday, October 3, 2001 at 11:24 pm)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Chris R.: Wed, Oct 3, 2001, 10:25 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (David: Wed, Oct 3, 2001, 11:24 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Chris R.: Wed, Oct 3, 2001, 11:42 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (CJ_NZ: Thu, Oct 4, 2001, 1:27 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Petru: Thu, Nov 1, 2001, 9:36 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Green_Ears: Sun, Nov 4, 2001, 12:52 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Dan-MCSE 2000: Thu, Nov 22, 2001, 4:25 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (tGulch: Tue, Nov 6, 2001, 2:05 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Joshua: Thu, Nov 8, 2001, 1:21 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Dave Ford: Sat, Nov 17, 2001, 12:16 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Mel: Mon, Nov 19, 2001, 8:18 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (TonyW: Thu, Oct 4, 2001, 6:46 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Guy: Fri, Oct 5, 2001, 3:11 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (TonyW: Fri, Oct 5, 2001, 3:50 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Johnny_GR: Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 12:31 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (PK: Thu, Nov 8, 2001, 11:55 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (someone you don't know: Wed, Nov 14, 2001, 6:46 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (xlioilx: Sun, Jan 30, 2005, 6:41 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Shawn: Fri, Mar 25, 2005, 7:37 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Falcon: Fri, Mar 25, 2005, 8:03 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Shawn: Fri, Mar 25, 2005, 1:04 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Janit0r: Mon, Nov 19, 2001, 7:45 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Gary: Fri, Nov 23, 2001, 8:54 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Steve: Fri, Apr 5, 2002, 11:32 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Vladamir Whojanickabollockoff: Fri, Dec 12, 2003, 8:41 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (D Morgan: Mon, Jan 5, 2004, 11:44 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Bill Gates: Sat, Jan 10, 2004, 4:51 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Rob: Fri, Feb 6, 2004, 3:50 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Rob: Fri, Feb 6, 2004, 3:39 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Paul T: Sat, Feb 7, 2004, 7:54 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (scott : Mon, Feb 9, 2004, 11:04 am)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.