|
|
|
re: XP home edition vs. Millenium?
Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 6:53 am Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Bob Holton
(1 messages posted)
XP is based on NT technology which SHOULD be better, BUT (BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT
BUT!!!)
Let me give you 2 real world examples......
1. On my machine I run the Seti At home app. On my machine running ME, it takes 8-10
hours per work unit. NOW.. install new disk drive, FRESH install of XP home edition
and now each Seti At home work unit runs at the blistering pace of 24-30 hours per
work unit. Yes, XP runs the same app on the same machine SLOWER than Windows ME.
Example 2. Friend of mine bought a brand new portable pre-loaded with XP professionsal.
Loads ALL his business stuff on it and his correspondence. THEN, his USB connector
on the motherboard fails. XP's respone?? BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH!!!. With a failing
USB controller, there is NO WAY to boot the portable even to safe mode, so there
is no way to get my friends data off his failing machine. His response?? He sent
his PC back and when it was repaired, he re-loaded with Win2k..
Good luck...(I think you will need it)
Bob
On Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 5:53 am, Mike Smith wrote:
>How much better is XP HOME edition vs. Millenium?
- Written in response to:
- XP home edition vs. Millenium? (Mike Smith: Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 5:53 am)
There are presently no replies to this message.
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: XP home edition vs. Millenium? (Bob Holton: Thu, Feb 21, 2002, 6:53 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|