|
|
|
re: XP home edition vs. Millenium?
Thursday, May 8, 2003 at 2:41 pm
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by MilleniuME
(1 messages posted)
Hey I find Windows ME the most stable operating system E.V.E.R people ''MUST'' buy
this software,but this is my opinion,but it goes without saying,allot of people say
''its windows 98 with a tint of windows 2000 thrown in for good measure'' but on
the other hand people say ''its windows 98 with an earl screib paintjob'' oh but
no the skin looks like windows 2000 which is NT 5.0 but on the other hand Windows
me is based on the Windows 9x Kernel,But Windows ME has most good and new features,thrown
in there for good like System Restore,this is a good feature,very good indeed.But
you can always soup up the performance of Windows ME with disk disfragmenter,No we
know you can do it with windows 95/98 but ME adds a bit of humor and also it suits
the whole family,no errors at all!!!!!! :) :) :)
My System Specs:
BN730 N motherboard with on/b AGP controllers
120GB Seagate Hard disk 7500 RPM
512 MB of High Performance SDRAM
AMD Athlon XP 2400 +
Geforce 4 MX 440 64 Meg AGP (Accelerated Graphics Port)
A Soundblaster Live! Soundcard
6 coolers and 1 watercooler
2 floppy disk drive controlers
On Sunday, February 2, 2003 at 10:40 am, Mike B. wrote:
>XP is better for being capatable with different componets (CD burners, ect.), but
>thats it. It other wise sucks. I have owned every versoin of windows since 3.0 and
>never had a bit of trouble till XP. I've got over $5000 dollars worth of software
>that will not run under XP. So I wiped my hard Disk and went back to win 98 se,
the
>best, most stable version of windows I have ever owned.
>
>
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  | re: XP home edition vs. Millenium? (MilleniuME: Thu, May 8, 2003, 2:41 pm) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|
