re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000
Saturday, January 10, 2004 at 4:51 am
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Bill Gates
(1 messages posted)
What can I say. WindBlowZ.
On Monday, January 5, 2004 at 11:44 am, D Morgan wrote:
>I have a p3 800 with 256megs and I dual boot with 2000 and XP and Linux mandrake
>9.
>I have been using both XP pro and 2000 since they were available.
>In my opinion 2000 is faster and a little more stable.
>XP has many new features as well as more services running in the back ground.
>Basically XP is cool if you have faster hardware to take advantages of the extra
>features and services without compromising performance.
> I think 2000 is a better choice for business use and home use if your an expert.
>XP seems a bit dumbed down to me,it seems like they tried to make it do every thing,
>giving experts shit they didn't want and average users shit they didn't need.
>2000 at first wasn't a good choice for gamers because of the lack of driver support.
>XP seemed at first to be better for games but by now you can do just as well with
>2000.
>Over all I think people in the know will simply dual boot both with Linux included
>as I have.
>As for which I use the most? 2000 gets my choice.
>One other thing, my 2000 seems to be running slower with each new update from MS.
>Could it be that the updates are simply turning my 2000 into XP?
>I don't know but on a bare bones level they have the same kernel.
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  | re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Bill Gates: Sat, Jan 10, 2004, 4:51 am) |
| |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|
|
