re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000
Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 6:41 am Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by xlioilx
(1 messages posted)
I agree xp is way faster I used 2k for years since it was first put out, and xp
just loads faster,runs smother with a hell of a lot less lock ups that make you have
to reboot. At first I hated xp and wanted to puke every time I looked at a screen
running it but, now it is my O.S. of choice out of windows.
Ok with xp on the computer at work fresh install it takes about 1 min to boot with
2k sp4 it takes 15.35 min just to get in to windows thats on a 500mhz celeron 96ram.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 6:46 am, someone you don't know wrote:
>xp is faster that 2k, and easier to administrate.. (on a Domain, or without network...)
>
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  | re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (xlioilx: Sun, Jan 30, 2005, 6:41 am) |
| |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|
|