Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1107096062 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000
Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 6:41 am
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by xlioilx (1 messages posted)


I agree xp is way faster I used 2k for years since it was first put out, and xp just loads faster,runs smother with a hell of a lot less lock ups that make you have to reboot. At first I hated xp and wanted to puke every time I looked at a screen running it but, now it is my O.S. of choice out of windows. Ok with xp on the computer at work fresh install it takes about 1 min to boot with 2k sp4 it takes 15.35 min just to get in to windows thats on a 500mhz celeron 96ram.


On Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 6:46 am, someone you don't know wrote:
>xp is faster that 2k, and easier to administrate.. (on a Domain, or without network...)
>


Written in response to:
re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (someone you don't know: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 6:46 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Shawn: Friday, March 25, 2005 at 7:37 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Chris R.: Wed, Oct 3, 2001, 10:25 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (David: Wed, Oct 3, 2001, 11:24 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Chris R.: Wed, Oct 3, 2001, 11:42 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (CJ_NZ: Thu, Oct 4, 2001, 1:27 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Petru: Thu, Nov 1, 2001, 9:36 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Green_Ears: Sun, Nov 4, 2001, 12:52 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Dan-MCSE 2000: Thu, Nov 22, 2001, 4:25 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (tGulch: Tue, Nov 6, 2001, 2:05 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Joshua: Thu, Nov 8, 2001, 1:21 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Dave Ford: Sat, Nov 17, 2001, 12:16 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Mel: Mon, Nov 19, 2001, 8:18 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (TonyW: Thu, Oct 4, 2001, 6:46 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Guy: Fri, Oct 5, 2001, 3:11 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (TonyW: Fri, Oct 5, 2001, 3:50 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Johnny_GR: Thu, Nov 29, 2001, 12:31 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (PK: Thu, Nov 8, 2001, 11:55 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (someone you don't know: Wed, Nov 14, 2001, 6:46 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (xlioilx: Sun, Jan 30, 2005, 6:41 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Shawn: Fri, Mar 25, 2005, 7:37 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Falcon: Fri, Mar 25, 2005, 8:03 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Shawn: Fri, Mar 25, 2005, 1:04 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Janit0r: Mon, Nov 19, 2001, 7:45 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Gary: Fri, Nov 23, 2001, 8:54 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Steve: Fri, Apr 5, 2002, 11:32 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Vladamir Whojanickabollockoff: Fri, Dec 12, 2003, 8:41 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (D Morgan: Mon, Jan 5, 2004, 11:44 am)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Bill Gates: Sat, Jan 10, 2004, 4:51 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Rob: Fri, Feb 6, 2004, 3:50 pm)
-re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Rob: Fri, Feb 6, 2004, 3:39 pm)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (Paul T: Sat, Feb 7, 2004, 7:54 am)
*re: Windows Xp vs. Windows 2000 (scott : Mon, Feb 9, 2004, 11:04 am)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.