Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1107953707 Search | Help | Home
  
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 4:55 am
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by smikwily (1 messages posted)


Unsure if you are using an external keyboard or docking station, but the IBM laptops 
remember the NumLock status if you have a keyboard plugged in with NumLock enabled 
via the keyboard. Some of our users don't turn on NumLock at all, for fear that they 
will forget to disable it when they have to use the laptop keyboard.

When we received our first batch of laptops, we were fine until our laptop users 
went to travel. Since their first keyboard function was to put their password in, 
which is only visible as a group of asterix, they couldn't see that their letters 
entered on the right hand side of their keyboard were numbers. After we found the 
problem, I had them check by typing their password on the username line to verify 
it was off.






On Sunday, February 29, 2004 at 10:54 am, out-there wrote:
>I'm also having this problem as well. I have a thinkpad t20 and for some reason,
>out of nowhere, this started happening.
>
>The thinkpad keyboard doesn't have a numpad section.. it's part of the regular keys.
>When I press "m", I get "0", "p" I get "*". I've tried everything I could possibly
>find out about this.
>
>"InitialKeyboardIndicators" being changed from "2" to "0" doesn't work because it
>always goes back to "2" after rebooting. Adding a key to another section as suggested
>from another site didn't work either. My bios doesn't have anything that helps this
>either. How is this notepad just decided to turn its numpad on and stay like that?
>
>



Written in response to:
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (out-there: Sunday, February 29, 2004 at 10:54 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mark Randol: Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 7:56 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Sun, Jul 13, 2003, 6:24 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (François: Wed, Sep 17, 2003, 1:03 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Wed, Sep 17, 2003, 4:24 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Matt M: Mon, Nov 17, 2003, 8:47 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Mon, Nov 17, 2003, 5:22 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Carter: Thu, Jan 29, 2004, 7:36 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (out-there: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 10:54 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Carter: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 1:54 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (out-there: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 8:28 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Dan: Tue, Apr 6, 2004, 10:23 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Kirk: Mon, May 3, 2004, 11:21 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Thomas Gregory: Sun, May 9, 2004, 11:23 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Brad: Tue, May 11, 2004, 9:24 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (uidiot: Tue, May 25, 2004, 9:01 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Randy: Wed, Aug 11, 2004, 8:29 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mark Randol: Wed, Nov 17, 2004, 9:15 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Keith: Sun, Aug 22, 2004, 8:47 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Franc: Tue, Nov 30, 2004, 7:00 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rob: Wed, Jan 26, 2005, 9:58 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (smikwily: Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 4:55 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mark Randol: Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 7:56 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Perry C: Sun, Apr 3, 2005, 5:21 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mario: Thu, Apr 7, 2005, 9:44 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Sanjeev Hasiza: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 10:37 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (e: Fri, Jan 6, 2006, 4:26 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Charlotte Irishman: Sun, Jun 18, 2006, 3:33 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Frank Polack: Fri, Aug 11, 2006, 6:57 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Cin: Fri, May 27, 2005, 1:06 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rich Kurtz: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 12:01 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Falcon: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 12:13 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Shailesh: Wed, Aug 24, 2005, 11:58 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Anthony: Sun, Sep 4, 2005, 5:39 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Steve: Wed, Sep 28, 2005, 8:47 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Jay McMunn: Fri, Dec 23, 2005, 6:45 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Fan of Jay McMunn: Tue, Dec 27, 2005, 8:16 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Tom: Thu, Dec 29, 2005, 6:01 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (irina kotcheva: Sun, Jul 2, 2006, 2:08 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Harold Austin: Tue, Oct 17, 2006, 6:05 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (JBarbaccia: Fri, Oct 27, 2006, 9:09 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rich Kurtz: Fri, Oct 27, 2006, 2:26 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (JBarbaccia: Mon, Oct 30, 2006, 7:59 am)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.