Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1117224415 Search | Help | Home
  
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Friday, May 27, 2005 at 1:06 pm
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Cin (1 messages posted)


I had this type of episode this week with an IBM ThinkPad R51, changing the bios setting had no desirable effect, the NUMLK was on at boot and windows logon, however the desired state was attained once a physical change was made to the hardware, in my case docking the laptop had that positive effect and I could not recreate an undesirable one. This took several hours of testing to finally reach this position, and it has happened more than once with this model unit in my workplace, but this is one side of the coin that might be tried.


On Sunday, July 13, 2003 at 6:24 pm, Pete wrote:
>I have a question about Force
>NumLock to Behave
:


>
>I don't want XP to touch my NumLock state at all.
>
>My Dell Latitude has a BIOS setting to that allows you set set numlock to on for
>only one docking state, and off for the other. This is useful, because I want NumLock
>on when docked (using a 101 keyboard), but off when undocked (because on the laptop
>keyboard, NumLock turns keys U,I,O,P,J,K,L,; into a numeric keypad. Annoying!
>
>So how do I stop XP from overriding the NumLock state at logon?


Written in response to:
Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Sunday, July 13, 2003 at 6:24 pm)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Sun, Jul 13, 2003, 6:24 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (François: Wed, Sep 17, 2003, 1:03 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Wed, Sep 17, 2003, 4:24 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Matt M: Mon, Nov 17, 2003, 8:47 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Mon, Nov 17, 2003, 5:22 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Carter: Thu, Jan 29, 2004, 7:36 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (out-there: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 10:54 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Carter: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 1:54 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (out-there: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 8:28 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Dan: Tue, Apr 6, 2004, 10:23 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Kirk: Mon, May 3, 2004, 11:21 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Thomas Gregory: Sun, May 9, 2004, 11:23 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Brad: Tue, May 11, 2004, 9:24 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (uidiot: Tue, May 25, 2004, 9:01 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Randy: Wed, Aug 11, 2004, 8:29 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mark Randol: Wed, Nov 17, 2004, 9:15 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Keith: Sun, Aug 22, 2004, 8:47 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Franc: Tue, Nov 30, 2004, 7:00 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rob: Wed, Jan 26, 2005, 9:58 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (smikwily: Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 4:55 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mark Randol: Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 7:56 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Perry C: Sun, Apr 3, 2005, 5:21 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mario: Thu, Apr 7, 2005, 9:44 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Sanjeev Hasiza: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 10:37 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (e: Fri, Jan 6, 2006, 4:26 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Charlotte Irishman: Sun, Jun 18, 2006, 3:33 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Frank Polack: Fri, Aug 11, 2006, 6:57 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Cin: Fri, May 27, 2005, 1:06 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rich Kurtz: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 12:01 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Falcon: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 12:13 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Shailesh: Wed, Aug 24, 2005, 11:58 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Anthony: Sun, Sep 4, 2005, 5:39 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Steve: Wed, Sep 28, 2005, 8:47 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Jay McMunn: Fri, Dec 23, 2005, 6:45 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Fan of Jay McMunn: Tue, Dec 27, 2005, 8:16 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Tom: Thu, Dec 29, 2005, 6:01 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (irina kotcheva: Sun, Jul 2, 2006, 2:08 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Harold Austin: Tue, Oct 17, 2006, 6:05 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (JBarbaccia: Fri, Oct 27, 2006, 9:09 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rich Kurtz: Fri, Oct 27, 2006, 2:26 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (JBarbaccia: Mon, Oct 30, 2006, 7:59 am)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.