Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1121886828 Search | Help | Home
  
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 at 12:13 pm
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Falcon (13489 messages posted)


The only place I worry about it is the emulated machine QEMU creates. Unfortunately, when using it, NumLock turns the host's numlock status on and off, not the emulated machine's, and entering the command in QEMU's monitor window to simulate the keypress isn't fun.

My Malware Removal Instructions


Perform the following:

  1. Disable System Restore *
  2. Perform an online virus scan * * * * .
  3. Download, update, and run these tools: Repeat as necessary until clean.
  4. If you still experience problems after doing these steps, download HijackThis * and post a log to this forum.
  5. To protect against reinfection, download and use these:
    If at all possible, I recommend that you use alternative software, particularly web browsers and email clients: If this is not a viable option, or for additional protection, use these:
  6. Optionally Reenable System Restore * . Better alternatives to System Restore.

If you encounter any broken links, please inform me of them. Also note that these links direct through my web server to allow me to keep them up-to-date or post additional info. If you are unable to use the links above, click the stars instead, which are a direct link to the page in question.





Written in response to:
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rich Kurtz: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 at 12:01 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Shailesh: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 at 11:58 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Sun, Jul 13, 2003, 6:24 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (François: Wed, Sep 17, 2003, 1:03 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Wed, Sep 17, 2003, 4:24 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Matt M: Mon, Nov 17, 2003, 8:47 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Pete: Mon, Nov 17, 2003, 5:22 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Carter: Thu, Jan 29, 2004, 7:36 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (out-there: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 10:54 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Carter: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 1:54 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (out-there: Sun, Feb 29, 2004, 8:28 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Dan: Tue, Apr 6, 2004, 10:23 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Kirk: Mon, May 3, 2004, 11:21 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Thomas Gregory: Sun, May 9, 2004, 11:23 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Brad: Tue, May 11, 2004, 9:24 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (uidiot: Tue, May 25, 2004, 9:01 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Randy: Wed, Aug 11, 2004, 8:29 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mark Randol: Wed, Nov 17, 2004, 9:15 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Keith: Sun, Aug 22, 2004, 8:47 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Franc: Tue, Nov 30, 2004, 7:00 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rob: Wed, Jan 26, 2005, 9:58 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (smikwily: Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 4:55 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mark Randol: Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 7:56 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Perry C: Sun, Apr 3, 2005, 5:21 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Mario: Thu, Apr 7, 2005, 9:44 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Sanjeev Hasiza: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 10:37 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (e: Fri, Jan 6, 2006, 4:26 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Charlotte Irishman: Sun, Jun 18, 2006, 3:33 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Frank Polack: Fri, Aug 11, 2006, 6:57 am)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Cin: Fri, May 27, 2005, 1:06 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rich Kurtz: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 12:01 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Falcon: Wed, Jul 20, 2005, 12:13 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Shailesh: Wed, Aug 24, 2005, 11:58 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Anthony: Sun, Sep 4, 2005, 5:39 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Steve: Wed, Sep 28, 2005, 8:47 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Jay McMunn: Fri, Dec 23, 2005, 6:45 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Fan of Jay McMunn: Tue, Dec 27, 2005, 8:16 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Tom: Thu, Dec 29, 2005, 6:01 pm)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (irina kotcheva: Sun, Jul 2, 2006, 2:08 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Harold Austin: Tue, Oct 17, 2006, 6:05 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (JBarbaccia: Fri, Oct 27, 2006, 9:09 am)
-re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (Rich Kurtz: Fri, Oct 27, 2006, 2:26 pm)
*re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave' (JBarbaccia: Mon, Oct 30, 2006, 7:59 am)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.