Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1130176816 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first?
Monday, October 24, 2005 at 11:00 am
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by ZoneIII (342 messages posted)


Can I make a Repair Installation with the disk that the slipstream program makes? In other words, I do not want to do a total reinstallation where I lose everything. One more thing.... I have now run a Repair Installation three times. Each time, I get an error message (0X8007007F) that says I am missing a file. It is failing to load the library C:\Windows\system32\catsrv.dll. (I wonder if the "sr" stands for System Restore because that is not working). Anyway, instructions are to clean the disk which I have done. No luck. Tried installing on different drive. Still no luck. That is a problem I will have to deal with separately later but my question is whether this would cause a problem when creating the disk with the slipstream program. I really appreciate your help and I apolgize for my ignorance.


On Monday, October 24, 2005 at 10:28 am, Dan Sarandrea, MCSE wrote:
>You can do either.
>
>In a nutshell, what slipstreaming does is integrate the files that have changed into
>the \i386 folder contained on the CD. So let's say that folder on the original XP
>CD had 2,000 files. And let's say that SP2 consists of changes to 1,500 of those
>original 2,000, and say 250 new files. The slipstream process simply replaces the
>old with the changed files, and adds the new.
>
>So now you working copy of the XP CDROM is "packed" up to SP2. If you have to do
>a repair reinstallation, if you do it with an SP2-level CD, then there is no need
>to separately download and install SP2 as in independent step...all that work was
>already done in the slipstream process.
>
>Compare that to your situation (as I understand it), where the computer was packed
>up to SP2, then the problem happened, then you repaired it with an SP1 (or maybe
>no SP at all) CDROM, that sent you backwards, then you had to catch up by installing
>SP2 again. Going back and forth like that with the thousands of files and registry
>settings is just inviting an avoidable disaster.


Written in response to:
re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (Dan Sarandrea, MCSE: Monday, October 24, 2005 at 10:28 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (Dan Sarandrea, MCSE: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 at 9:49 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (ZoneIII: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 7:57 am)
-re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (Cam: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 8:11 am)
-re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (ZoneIII: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 8:19 am)
-re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (Dan Sarandrea, MCSE: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 8:33 am)
*re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (ZoneIII: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 9:16 am)
-re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (ZoneIII: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 9:20 am)
-re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (Dan Sarandrea, MCSE: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 10:28 am)
-re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (ZoneIII: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 11:00 am)
*re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (Dan Sarandrea, MCSE: Tue, Oct 25, 2005, 9:49 am)
*re: After XP repair installation, should I install SP2 first? (Cam: Mon, Oct 24, 2005, 9:36 am)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.