Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1140906364 Search | Help | Home
  
re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS'
Saturday, February 25, 2006 at 2:26 pm
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by noonsailing (1 messages posted)


I read this as saying that I don't need a separate partition for DOS, so long as the one partition I have is FAT32. How would I know or find out whether something is a FAT32 partition? I am running Windows XP.


On Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 5:43 pm, Nathan wrote:
>Not true at all.
>
>yes it is possible to dual boot XP and DOS, ignore everything everyone else posted
>and follow these simple instructions.
>
>will only work if you have a partition with FAT32 to install DOS on.
>
>Download DOS 7.10
>

http://newdos.yginfo.net/msdos71.htm


>
>Once you have created the install disks or CD, put it in the drive reboot and install.
>
>make sure you dont choose
>overwrite mbr
>overwrite boot sector data
>
>make sure you choose
>DUAL BOOT!
>
>you can install DOS to any drive thats a FAT32 partition, and you can also put it
>on the same drive as XP as long as its FAT32.
>
>not many people know that its possible to install DOS 7.10 after XP and still make
>it DUAL-BOOT, but it CAN BE DONE!
>
>and edit autoexec.bat if you want it to boot straight into a DOS based app - thanks
>otter!
>
>-nate
>
>
>


Written in response to:
re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (Nathan: Wednesday, April 6, 2005 at 5:43 pm)

Responses to this message:
*Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Kiwi: Saturday, February 25, 2006 at 2:55 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (Ashe Corven: Wed, Dec 19, 2001, 2:05 am)
-re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (Tony Jay: Wed, Dec 19, 2001, 2:32 am)
-re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (Nathan: Wed, Apr 6, 2005, 5:43 pm)
-re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (noonsailing: Sat, Feb 25, 2006, 2:26 pm)
-Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Kiwi: Sat, Feb 25, 2006, 2:55 pm)
-re: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Nathan: Sat, Jun 24, 2006, 7:33 pm)
*re: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Chris: Wed, Mar 14, 2007, 9:52 pm)
-A DOS Window is available...... (Tom S: Fri, Dec 21, 2001, 5:53 am)
*re: A DOS Window is available...... (John Smith: Fri, Dec 26, 2003, 9:10 am)
-re: A DOS Window is available...... (Rublore: Fri, Feb 13, 2004, 5:42 pm)
-re: A DOS Window is available...... (Casey Ulrich: Wed, Apr 14, 2004, 11:21 am)
-re: A DOS Window is available...... (Wingot Dingus: Thu, Jun 10, 2004, 5:37 am)
*re: A DOS Window is available...... (jason: Mon, Jul 26, 2004, 11:31 pm)
*re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (RJC33: Sat, Sep 22, 2007, 2:32 am)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.