Annoyances.org - re: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Windows XP Discussion Forum)


Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1151202821	Search \| Help \| Home

re: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . .
Saturday, June 24, 2006 at 7:33 pm
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Nathan (107 messages posted)

Off topic even? wow! Dual booting dos and windows xp is not a windows topic? wow. wow Is that how you got 1800 messages kiwi? By writing useless comments many months after no one is writing to a thread. Are all your comments as pointless as this thread I am writing now. wow. Hey this is great, I can write useless comments, hey maybe I can get 1800 comments and maybe people might think Im like a guru cause I have thousands of comments. Dude. ANYWAY. This information is not widely known, iask any IT expert if its possible to dual boot DOS and xp off the same partition, and 99% will say no, and yes only if you installed windows over the top of DOS. Anyway information like this is not widely avaliable, and instead of praising it, you say, ah its off topic, go post somewhere. Typical how real information, people dont wanna know. Why not? maybe they are jealous, pious, religious or whatever. Anyway, Ill leave it to that. Anyone else reading this, Think what you think, do what you do. whatever -Nathan (8 months later lol)

On Saturday, February 25, 2006 at 2:55 pm, Kiwi wrote:
>Your question and that last person's answer are both factually off- topic, and thus
>they both belong in a "DOS" forum, not here in a Windows forum, and I am sure you
>can Google up just such a place with a little effort, since I don't think that the
>person you are trying to reach with your question stuck around in here after writing
>that.
>
>
>
>

.
>

>Kiwi
>

>**
>

Written in response to:: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Kiwi: Saturday, February 25, 2006 at 2:55 pm)

Responses to this message:
re: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Chris: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 at 9:52 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]

Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (Ashe Corven: Wed, Dec 19, 2001, 2:05 am)

re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (Tony Jay: Wed, Dec 19, 2001, 2:32 am)

re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (Nathan: Wed, Apr 6, 2005, 5:43 pm)

re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (noonsailing: Sat, Feb 25, 2006, 2:26 pm)

Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Kiwi: Sat, Feb 25, 2006, 2:55 pm)

re: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Nathan: Sat, Jun 24, 2006, 7:33 pm)

re: Given that XP contains NO "DOS" of its own at all (only an emulation) . . (Chris: Wed, Mar 14, 2007, 9:52 pm)

A DOS Window is available...... (Tom S: Fri, Dec 21, 2001, 5:53 am)

re: A DOS Window is available...... (John Smith: Fri, Dec 26, 2003, 9:10 am)

re: A DOS Window is available...... (Rublore: Fri, Feb 13, 2004, 5:42 pm)

re: A DOS Window is available...... (Casey Ulrich: Wed, Apr 14, 2004, 11:21 am)

re: A DOS Window is available...... (Wingot Dingus: Thu, Jun 10, 2004, 5:37 am)

re: A DOS Window is available...... (jason: Mon, Jul 26, 2004, 11:31 pm)

re: Question about 'Boot Directly into DOS' (RJC33: Sat, Sep 22, 2007, 2:32 am)

Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum