re: Wireless security Monday, July 6, 2009 at 4:52 pm Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by triplate (20834 messages posted) well.........theres no sense in illusion ...unless you can change frequency at random and encrypt heavily..Wireless is wide open to anyone with a simple scanner.....i,ve never used it and never will at my base... but then again..i thought 3.11 was great...LOL* Written in response to: re: Wireless security (Cal: Monday, July 6, 2009 at 4:47 pm) Responses to this message: re: Wireless security (Adam Bradley: Monday, July 6, 2009 at 6:47 pm) All messages in this thread [show all] Wireless security (Cal: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 9:32 am) re: Wireless security (Larry: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 10:21 am) re: Wireless security (alex: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 10:22 am) re: Wireless security (Cal: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 10:29 am) re: Wireless security (oleg: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 10:42 am) re: Wireless security (Adam Bradley: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 11:34 am) re: Wireless security (MartinM: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 1:23 pm) re: Wireless security (Cal: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 4:08 pm) re: Wireless security (triplate: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 1:28 pm) re: Wireless security (Cal: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 4:47 pm) re: Wireless security (triplate: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 4:52 pm) re: Wireless security (Adam Bradley: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 6:47 pm) re: Wireless security (triplate: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 7:02 pm) re: Wireless security (Cal: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 4:13 pm) re: Wireless security (Ari: Mon, Jul 6, 2009, 9:19 pm) re: Wireless security (oleg: Tue, Jul 7, 2009, 1:29 am) re: Wireless security (Dan Sarandrea, MCSE: Wed, Jul 8, 2009, 7:53 am) re: Wireless security (Ari: Wed, Jul 8, 2009, 8:24 am) re: Wireless security (Dan Sarandrea, MCSE: Wed, Jul 8, 2009, 8:54 am) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum