Annoyances.org
Home » Windows XP Discussion Forum » Message 1248048646 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Registry cleaners - don't use 'em !
Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Adam Bradley (8786 messages posted)


the point is registry cleaners do no good 99.9% of the time, an unused entry in your 
registry is just that, unused. It does no harm at all by simply existing and the 
performance boost that supposedly comes from cleaning is debatable at best. Most 
errors detected are in fact harmless and might actually be there for a reason that 
the cleaner does not detect. So you are taking an action that has no real benefit 
and carries great risk, it is like playing Russian roulette to keep your gun clean. 
Sure you might have had no trouble so far but you take great risk and get no reward 
out of it. 

the .1% of the time a registry error is a problem handling it directly is better than running a cleaner so you know what you are fixing and how to set it back if you need to.


On Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 4:20 pm, pauly007usa wrote:
>Hello Martin, I know you know what your talking about from other advise you have
>given me. However, I have been using Tune up utilities Reg cleaner 2007 for two
>years with no problems and it seems to keep my Reg in good shape, with no adverse
>affects as of yet. It automatically makes a restore point before making it's changes.
> However, thanks for the info. cCleaner, appears to do much more.
>
>
>




Written in response to:
re: Registry cleaners - don't use 'em ! (pauly007usa: Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 4:20 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Registry cleaners - don't use 'em ! (pauly007usa: Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 10:34 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Registry cleaners (JW: Fri, Jul 17, 2009, 2:28 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners (taboga: Fri, Jul 17, 2009, 3:35 pm)
*re: Registry cleaners (JW: Sat, Jul 18, 2009, 8:19 am)
-re: Registry cleaners (Adam Bradley: Fri, Jul 17, 2009, 3:46 pm)
*re: Registry cleaners (JW: Sat, Jul 18, 2009, 8:21 am)
-re: Registry cleaners (Ms. Eagle: Fri, Jul 17, 2009, 5:13 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners (JW: Sat, Jul 18, 2009, 8:14 am)
-re: Registry cleaners (Ms. Eagle: Sat, Jul 18, 2009, 12:01 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners (Adam Bradley: Sat, Jul 18, 2009, 1:23 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners (Ms. Eagle: Sat, Jul 18, 2009, 1:40 pm)
*re: Registry cleaners (NigelHH: Sun, Jul 19, 2009, 12:15 am)
-re: Registry cleaners (Ricer46: Fri, Jul 17, 2009, 8:30 pm)
*re: Registry cleaners (JW: Sat, Jul 18, 2009, 8:17 am)
-re: Registry cleaners (pauly007usa: Sun, Jul 19, 2009, 3:39 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners - don't use 'em ! (MartinM: Sun, Jul 19, 2009, 3:57 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners - don't use 'em ! (pauly007usa: Sun, Jul 19, 2009, 4:20 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners - don't use 'em ! (Adam Bradley: Sun, Jul 19, 2009, 5:10 pm)
*re: Registry cleaners - don't use 'em ! (pauly007usa: Sun, Jul 19, 2009, 10:34 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners.. oh please (Ms. Eagle: Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 12:56 am)
-re: Registry cleaners . . no thank you (MartinM: Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 3:19 am)
-re: Registry cleaners . . no thank you (Ms. Eagle: Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 12:05 pm)
-re: Registry cleaners . . no thank you (MartinM: Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 12:26 pm)
*re: Registry cleaners . . no thank you (Ms. Eagle: Mon, Jul 20, 2009, 1:22 pm)
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.