re: How to make a mapped drive consistently connected? Thursday, October 15, 2009 at 6:14 pm Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by Francis (18 messages posted) yes, i agree with you. Thanks alot for the advice. On Thursday, October 15, 2009 at 3:44 pm, MartinM wrote: > >Not really possible in the way you want. > >Once the connection is interrupted and the transfer interrupted, re-establishing >the connection is not going to uncorrupt (if there is such a verb !) your files. > >The flaw in the setup you have is in the transfer mechanism which is not resilient >enough to what it is having to cope with. You need the equivalent of a download manager, >but its the applications which are driving the transfer which you need to be changing. >That of course may be impossible. > >But the underlying issue is really one of the design of your application architecture. >For instance why not have the program write to a local drive and then use a separate >process to copy to your network drive - then you can re-copy if the oringianl copy >process fails through interruption ? > Written in response to: re: How to make a mapped drive consistently connected? (MartinM: Thursday, October 15, 2009 at 3:44 pm) There are presently no replies to this message. All messages in this thread [show all] How to make a mapped drive consistently connected? (Francis: Wed, Oct 14, 2009, 9:13 pm) re: How to make a mapped drive consistently connected? (MartinM: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 6:59 am) re: How to make a mapped drive consistently connected? (Francis: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 10:36 am) re: How to make a mapped drive consistently connected? (MartinM: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 3:44 pm) re: How to make a mapped drive consistently connected? (Francis: Thu, Oct 15, 2009, 6:14 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum