Question about 'Why do even the smallest files take up so much disk space?'
Showing all messages in thread #1031275392 Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
The following are all of the messages in this thread (3 in all), shown in chronological order. Click any message subject to view that message by itself or to view the thread hierarchy.
|
Question about 'Why do even the smallest files take up so much disk space?'
Thursday, September 5, 2002 at 6:23 pm Posted by Dom De Vitto
(1 messages posted)
There is an easy way to sort this: convert your filesystem to NTFS and compress all
the files (that you can). This has many benifits:
1) files <1024 bytes get stored in the MFT, not in 512+ byte clusters.
2) #1 means file size *after* compression.
3) Compression speeds *up* access.
Point #3 I read in windows NT mag a couple of years back. Basically your CPU can
decompress faster than your IO subsystem can read. Also compression effectively doubles
the size of the in-memory disk cache.
I usually boot into safe mode and select all the top level directories and make them
compressed, that makes sure that everying that can be is compressed (programs/files
can't be compressed if they are in use)
Also make sure you don't leave the root of the drive as compressed (e.g. in the C
drive properties box), as reinstalling seems to require an uncompressed root folder
(dunno why...)
Dom
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
Question about 'Why do even the smallest files take up so much disk space?'
Tuesday, November 11, 2003 at 7:24 pm Posted by Michael gibbons
(5 messages posted)
Replying to the message convert to ntfs and compress all the folders, I recommend
not compressing the program folder or windows folder or document and settings folder.
i compressed these folders and tried to install a program and gave me all kinds of
errors. but i redid my computer because even after uncompressing those folders the
program still refused to install right with errors. I redone my computer and let
those folders uncompressed and the program installed without the hassle. I agree
though compressing folders do help save space but be nice if microsoft told you what
folders not to compress so windows would operate normal. also i should mention never
compress boot.ini in the root directory of c. i did and my computer would not boot
up.
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Why do even the smallest files take up so much disk space?'
Saturday, November 15, 2003 at 3:09 pm Posted by crashmaster
(5 messages posted)
HAAA all too familuar ....thanx for the warning as i was eager to COMPRESS EVERYTHING
i could haaaa....even with my 146gig of drives I look for fastest options availiable
!!
Haa again thanx and sorry for youre troubles ....too funny tho i have done so many
of the same things thru every windows system till xp ..haaa wow ...
convience my A** .......lol
ITS NOT THOSE DANG COMPUTERS
ITS THOSE DANG USERS !!!
On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 at 7:24 pm, michael gibbons wrote:
>Replying to the message convert to ntfs and compress all the folders, I recommend
>not compressing the program folder or windows folder or document and settings folder.
>i compressed these folders and tried to install a program and gave me all kinds
of
>errors. but i redid my computer because even after uncompressing those folders the
>program still refused to install right with errors. I redone my computer and let
>those folders uncompressed and the program installed without the hassle. I agree
>though compressing folders do help save space but be nice if microsoft told you
what
>folders not to compress so windows would operate normal. also i should mention never
>compress boot.ini in the root directory of c. i did and my computer would not boot
>up.
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
|
Tip: Use one of the [Reply or follow-up to this message] links above to add a message to this thread
|
|
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|