|
|
|
re: Question about 'Things that slow down system bootup'
Wednesday, September 25, 2002 at 2:02 am
Posted by Ms. Eagle
(33507 messages posted)
If you're a "computer guru" why wouldn't you know that XP would need more Ram to
run than 98???
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Things that slow down system bootup'
Friday, September 27, 2002 at 3:25 pm
Posted by MuFFDiVeR
(1 messages posted)
Yeah "guru"... read the specs:
XP
Compatibility: Windows XP
Database(s): Microsoft SQL; Microsoft Access
Networks supported: Windows NTS 4.0
Minimum RAM recommended: 128 MB
Minimum RAM required: 64 MB
Disk space required: 1.5 GB
Additional hardware/software required: 300 MHz processor
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002 at 2:02 am, CJ wrote:
>
>If you're a "computer guru" why wouldn't you know that XP would need more Ram to
>run than 98???
>
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Things that slow down system bootup'
Thursday, March 20, 2003 at 8:59 am
Posted by mark
(1 messages posted)
Who ever wrote that response was a twit. 256 ram should be fine. I'm only running
128 w/ xp just see how many programs are running in the bg and disable the ones you
don't need then you should be fine
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002 at 12:34 am, The_Computer_Guru_777 wrote:
>I have a question about Things
>that slow down system bootup:
>
>I want to speed up a system running windows xp pro it is 500 MHz 256 RAM 8GB and
>ran 98 fine but xp is running slow why?
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Things that slow down system bootup'
Thursday, May 29, 2003 at 7:58 am
Posted by Vizion
(1 messages posted)
Check to see if you have the Windows XP HotFix Q811493 patch installed in your computer
(you can check by going into control panel > add/remove programs). If installed,
the patch creates immense slowdown on windows xp systems, creating the use of 90-150%
more system resources. Delete the patch and you should see windows return to normal
speed.
This security patch was used to prevent a hacker from raising his privilege level
on a vulnerable system. However, he would need physical access to the machine, via
the node or a local intranet. This patch is not necessary for home based users
On Thursday, March 20, 2003 at 8:59 am, mark wrote:
>
>Who ever wrote that response was a twit. 256 ram should be fine. I'm only running
>128 w/ xp just see how many programs are running in the bg and disable the ones
you
>don't need then you should be fine
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Things that slow down system bootup'
Sunday, June 15, 2003 at 4:17 am
Posted by Jennifer
(3 messages posted)
Mark, how do you find out what's running in the background?
On Thursday, March 20, 2003 at 8:59 am, mark wrote:
>
>Who ever wrote that response was a twit. 256 ram should be fine. I'm only running
>128 w/ xp just see how many programs are running in the bg and disable the ones
you
>don't need then you should be fine
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Things that slow down system bootup'
Saturday, October 2, 2004 at 2:13 am
Posted by Vanessa
(1 messages posted)
hey, iv got the problem of that silly hotfix Q811493, and its hard core slowing my
computer down. I dont know alot about computers, but iv tried every way that i know
of removing it, but it just wont go away! Iv tried to go the a add/remove programs
thing in control panel, and i click onto it and it doesnt have a remove buttn. Iv
tried to do a search on my computer and to delete it that way and it just comes back.
Id even delete it out of the recycle bin but it would re-appear the next time i started
up my computer.is there anyone who could tell me another way to go about it? Coz
im totally at a loss! its real frustrating. Your help would be much appreciated!
On Thursday, May 29, 2003 at 7:58 am, Vizion wrote:
>Check to see if you have the Windows XP HotFix Q811493 patch installed in your computer
>(you can check by going into control panel > add/remove programs). If installed,
>the patch creates immense slowdown on windows xp systems, creating the use of 90-150%
>more system resources. Delete the patch and you should see windows return to normal
>speed.
>
>This security patch was used to prevent a hacker from raising his privilege level
>on a vulnerable system. However, he would need physical access to the machine, via
>the node or a local intranet. This patch is not necessary for home based users
>
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
| |
Tip: Use one of the [Reply or follow-up to this message] links above to add a message to this thread
| |
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|
