Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Showing all messages in thread #1110300094
Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum
The following are all of the messages in this thread (8 in all), shown in chronological order. Click any message subject to view that message by itself or to view the thread hierarchy.
|
Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 8:41 am
Posted by Neptali
(1 messages posted)
I have a question about Force
NumLock to Behave:
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 11:18 am
Posted by BHC
(989 messages posted)
I have a question about your
post:
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 11:22 am
Posted by Falcon
(13489 messages posted)
Hehehe... ;)
The Wereotter
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 12:30 pm
Posted by tom n
(20 messages posted)
You guys are missing the introduction of a new MS superkey, the Gullible Colon, also
known as Powell Colon. Just click on the colon after the word "behave" and the whole
message will appear. ps. This person is a newbie, don't scare him/her away.
On Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 11:22 am, Otter wrote:
>Hehehe... ;)
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Monday, March 14, 2005 at 1:03 pm
Posted by bobshaw
(1 messages posted)
More koolaid, please. Win2K does not follow CMOS NumLock, and registry fix does not
go into effect until after logon.
Me, stuck with these accounting types who don't understand why there are two sets
of redundant keys on the right side of the keyboard.
I'm sure the MS propeller heads know what's best for us.
On Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 11:18 am, BHC wrote:
>
>I have a question about your
>post:
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Monday, March 14, 2005 at 1:11 pm
Posted by BHC
(989 messages posted)
What?
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Monday, March 14, 2005 at 1:18 pm
Posted by Falcon
(13489 messages posted)
Take the modification for turning Numlock on and apply to HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT instead
of to HKEY_CURRENT_USER.
The Wereotter
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Question about 'Force NumLock to Behave'
Tuesday, February 21, 2006 at 1:45 pm
Posted by Robert William Fischer
(1 messages posted)
Thanks. Your tip fixed the problem on my computer that the others did not.
On Monday, March 14, 2005 at 1:18 pm, Falcon wrote:
>Take the modification for turning Numlock on and apply to HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT instead
>of to HKEY_CURRENT_USER.
> The Wereotter
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
|
Tip: Use one of the [Reply or follow-up to this message] links above to add a message to this thread
|
|
Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum
|
